ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison Between Two Shock Wave Regimens for Treating Urinary Stones
In order to check if a reduction in the frequency and total number of shocks delivered during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) results in a great number of stone-free patients,the investigators compared two different ways of treating urinary stones using SWL.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effect of Double J Stent on Outcomes of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy#1033110
- Extracorporal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Kidney Stones#1125620
- Shockwave Lithotripsy (SWL) Under Selective, General Anesthesia.#891764
- Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy, Electroconductive and Electrohydraulic Types#882337
- Role of Urine PH in Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes in Renal Stone Disease#846624
Record · ID 1308325
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive