ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
AMBU AScope2 Fiberoptic Intubation Versus Fastrach Intubating LMA
The purpose of this study is to compare two types of supraglottic airways (SGA), the Ambu® Aura-I and the Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA), regarding time to intubate, ease of insertion, sealing properties, optical view upon fiberoptic examination regarding the Ambu Aura-I, ease and success rate of intubation, airway morbidity, and patient comfort in patients undergoing general anesthesia for elective surgery.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Nebulized 3% Hypertonic Saline Versus Normal Saline in Managing Children With Acute Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial#1033423
- Clinical Performance of Laryseal Clear Versus Ambu Aura 40 Laryngeal Mask Airway for Preschool Children#1174025
- Comparison of Endotracheal Intubation Over the Aintree Via the I-gel and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme#806372
- Role of Ultrasonography in Airway Management#1340252
- Comparison of Different Local Anesthetic Dose in Suprascapular and Axillary Blocks in Shoulder Arthroscopies#1125441
Record · ID 1309287
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive