A survey on factors influencing mobile application usability through the lens of PACMAD+3 model
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
[2502.11069] A survey on factors influencing mobile application usability through the lens of PACMAD+3 model Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Search arXiv Press Enter to search · Advanced search Computer Science > Human-Computer Interaction arXiv:2502.11069 (cs) [Submitted on 16 Feb 2025 ( v1 ), last revised 10 Apr 2026 (this version, v2)] Title: A survey on factors influencing mobile application usability through the lens of PACMAD+3 model Authors: Pawel Weichbroth View a PDF of the paper titled A survey on factors influencing mobile application usability through the lens of PACMAD+3 model, by Pawel Weichbroth View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: Undeniably, the advent of mobile applications has brought new frontiers to usability engineering. To date, ongoing research has shown significant efforts to adopt and adapt usability principles to the mobile computing environment. One of these endeavors is the PACMAD+3 model. However, to the best of our knowledge, little or no effort has been made to empirically evaluate these factors against perceived influence. With this in mind, the objective of this study is to explore this issue. To achieve this goal in a reliable and reproducible manner, we took advantage of previous attempts to conceptualize the mobile usability factors, but we contribute by operationalizing these theoretical constructs into observable and measurable phenomena. In this sense, the survey was designed and carried out on a sample of 838 users to assess the significance of the PACMAD+3 factors on the perceived usability of mobile applications. Our findings show that, on average, users rated efficiency as highly important, while the remaining seven, namely: cognitive load, errors, learnability, operability, effectiveness, memorability, and understandability, were rated moderately important. Insights into the importance of usability factors and the corresponding features can also facilitate the design and development of mobile applications. Therefore, our research contributes to the field of human-computer interaction with theoretical and practical implications for mobile usability researchers, UX designers, and quality assurance engineers. Comments: 52 pages; 2 figure; 18 tables; 172 references Subjects: Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC) Cite as: arXiv:2502.11069 [cs.HC] (or arXiv:2502.11069v2 [cs.HC] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.11069 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Paweł Weichbroth [ view email ] [v1] Sun, 16 Feb 2025 10:30:33 UTC (225 KB) [v2] Fri, 10 Apr 2026 05:03:49 UTC (307 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled A survey on factors influencing mobile application usability through the lens of PACMAD+3 model, by Pawel Weichbroth View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.HC < prev | next > new | recent | 2025-02 Change to browse by: cs References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab) Major funding support from
Related documents
- The E3 Framework: A Conceptual Framework for Software Quality in the Age of Artificial Intelligence#29014
- The E3 Framework: A Conceptual Framework for Software Quality in the Age of Artificial Intelligence#29013
- 3.1. System readiness and strategic integration#125693
- Estrategia de comunicación digital para la Alianza Basura Cero con enfoque en la implementación de modelos Basura Cero en áreas urbanas#385837
- Behavior Trees for Robotic Systems: An Empirical Study on Practices and Experiences#1037087
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive