Open Access LMU
metadata only
CC BY 4.0
Social Media and Radicalization: An Affordance Approach for Cross-Platform Comparison
o accentuate which platform characteristics particularly foster radicalization and extremist dynamics, this contribution investigates the affordances of social media as delineated in con temporary literature, conducting a platform comparison encompassing Telegram, WhatsApp, and X ( formerly Twitt
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Commenti sui social: comunicazione digitale, partecipazione politica e social media#764840
- Which Platforms Count? The Diverse Meanings of "Social Media" in the United States#423359
- Far-right conspiracy groups on fringe platforms: a longitudinal analysis of radicalization dynamics on Telegram#1135009
- Social Media and its Negative Impacts on Autonomy#105443
- Alternative Social Platforms as Opportunity Structures for Alternative News#1313529
Record · ID 1313525
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive