OSF
open access
Where Silicon Samples Go Wrong: Item-Level Coefficient Distortion in LLM-Simulated Chinese Public Opinion
Do regressions fitted to survey responses simulated by large language models return the coefficients human data would? We used four 2026 models to generate responses to the full attitude-item bank of two Chinese General Social Survey waves, conditioning on 1,000 respondents’ demographic profiles per
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Where Silicon Samples Go Wrong: Item-Level Coefficient Distortion in LLM-Simulated Chinese Public Opinion#1318048
- Silicon sampling answers with country-level assumptions, not individual attitudes: Cross-national evidence from the European Social Survey#1110755
- Mitigating Social Desirability Bias in Random Silicon Sampling#1199734
- DiSCo: A Distribution-First Steering and Cultural Prior Evaluation Framework for Measuring Cultural Preference Bias in LLMs#997152
- Localizing Persona Representations in LLMs#1325011
Record · ID 1313716
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive