Zenodo (CERN)
open access
Answerability and Institutional Commitment: Why Missing Bearership Is Not Defective Ownership
Answerability and Institutional Commitment: Why Missing Bearership Is Not Defective Ownership examines a fundamental problem in institutional philosophy and AI-mediated communication: an institution may remain responsible for a commitment even when it fails to justify, reconsider
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Charities, Endowments, and Donor Intent: The Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act#181422
- Implicit dominance: Truthfulness of implicit information shapes commitment across meanings, but explicit truthfulness is limited to explicit meaning#16496
- Equal Societies, Autonomous Lives: Reconciling social equality and relational autonomy#111927
- Trust as "Uncorporation": A Research Agenda#942110
- On Successful Communication, Intentions and False Beliefs#76655
Record · ID 1318482
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive