arXiv CS
open access
Interaction-as-a-Judge
Coding agents are tasked with producing sophisticated interactive applications such as websites, desktop applications, and games. While humans assess these applications interactively, current automated LLM evaluations primarily focus on code analysis and unit tests. This mismatch can cause LLM judge
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Interaction-as-a-Judge#1344704
- Evaluating LLM Agents on Automated Software Analysis Tasks#10421
- Toollery: Scaling LLM Agents to Thousands of Skills and Tools#1036901
- Towards a Systems Foundation for Agentic Skills: Architecture, Lifecycle, and Security#798236
- Towards a Systems Foundation for Agentic Skills: Architecture, Lifecycle, and Security#796823
Record · ID 1319083
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive