ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Effects of Expert Arbitration on Clinical Outcomes When Disputes Over Diagnosis Arise Between Physicians and Their Artificial Intelligence Counterparts: a Randomized, Multicenter Trial in Pediatric Outpatients
We have recently developed an artificial intelligence (AI) framework to diagnose common pediatric diseases. This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to investigate the effects of expert arbitration on clinical outcomes in the situation where the AI-based diagnosis differs from the diagnosis made by pediatricians.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Patient Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Radiology#870299
- Clinical applications of artificial intelligence in radiology#686500
- Patient Perspectives and Expectations on the Use of Artificial Intelligence to Guide Treatment Decision-Making in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Qualitative Study.#975664
- Defining physician-AI collaboration in pulmonary and critical care medicine: concepts and illustrative examples for clinical reasoning.#242188
- Governing Decisions of Probability Cutoffs in Clinical AI Deployment: A Case Study of Asthma Exacerbation Prediction#130565
Record · ID 1320284
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive