ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of the Bulb Aspirator to a Nasal Oral Aspirator in the Treatment of Bronchiolitis
The investigators aim to compare the standard bulb aspirator with that of a nasal oral aspirator. The hypothesis is that use of a nasal oral aspirator is more effective at removing nasal secretions in the treatment of bronchiolitis as measured by a predicted 50% decrease in the rate of unscheduled bronchiolitis return visits. The primary endpoint will be the number of unscheduled bronchiolitis return visits; secondary endpoints will include measurements of oral intake, respiratory relief, parental device preference and adverse events.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- CRS Questionnaire Validation Project#1010734
- Chronic Rhinosinusitis in a Danish Population: Evaluation of Causes of Disease, Progress and Treatment#874166
- Whitsundays (Nasal) Mask Take Home Study (90 Days)#1163561
- Mask use during COVID-19: a risk adjusted strategy#1017085
- Improving Sleep Quality in Flap Patients in the SICU#1088850
Record · ID 1320664
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive