ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A Multi-center, Prospective, Single-blind, Controlled Trial Comparing Diagnostic Value of Different EUS-FNA Techniques
The aim of this study is to compare endoscopic ultrasound guided-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) with a standard 22-gauge needle using "standard suction", "slow-pull" and "wet suction" for thoracic/abdominal solid/solid-cystic lesions. Investigators intend to compare the effectiveness and safety of the three methods in order to discover the optimized technique for obtaining diagnostic material and making accurate diagnosis.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Masses: Histological and Immunohistochemical Evaluation#840837
- Evaluation of Diagnostic Yield of EUS-Guided Tissue Sampling#851623
- EUS-FNA With 22G Procore Needles vs 22G Conventional Needles#865788
- Comparative Study of 22 and 25 Gauge ProCore EUS-guided Biopsy in Pancreatic Mass#1321062
- A Clinical Trial With a New Needle Device Comparing Two Needles for EUS_FNA of Solid Lesions.#1150577
Record · ID 1321512
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive