ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Caudal Block and Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block With Dexmedetomidine in Pediatric Penile Hypospadias Repair
Hypospadias is one of the most common congenital anomalies in childhood, requiring surgical reconstruction (1). It is a penile malformation with a more proximal or ventral location beyond the usual localization of the urethra. Hypospadias is a common congenital urogenital anomaly in male children, and its incidence is reported to be approximately one in every 300 births. However, it is suggested that hypospadias may increase in developed countries (2, 3). Postoperative pain management followinghypospadias repair is of great importance, as inadequatepain control may lead to adverse endocrine, metabolic, and inflammatory stress responses, resulting in higher morbidity and poor recovery(4). Regional anesthesia has gained increasing attention in pediatric surgery as a valuable tool for managing perioperative pain and improving surgical outcomes(5). The caudal epidural block has long been considered the gold standard technique fo infraumbilical surgeries, including hypospadias repair, due to its proven efficacy and safety (4). However, its limitations include a relatively short durationof analgesia, the need for larger local anesthetic volumes, and potential adverse effects such as motor block, urinary retention, and inadvertent dural puncture. These drawbacks have led anesthesiologists to explore alternative regional techniques(6-8) Recently, the sacral erector spinae plane (ESPB) block has been introduced as a novel technique for postoperative analgesia in children(9, 10). It is an emerging regional anesthetic technique with significant potential for clinical benefit Nevertheless, its exact mechanism(s) of action have been much debated. These mechanisms include neural blockade and central inhibition from direct spread of local anesthetic to the paravertebral or epidural space, and analgesia mediated by elevated local anesthetic plasma concentrations due to systemic absorption(11). Evidence suggests sacral ESP block can give excellent analgesia in surgical procedures
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block and Caudal Epidural Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Hypospadias Surgery#863713
- Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of ESP Block and Caudal Block in Patients Undergoing Hypospadias Surgery#905583
- Comparison of Sacral ESP Block and Caudal Block in Pediatric Hypospadias Surgery#1230453
- Comparison of the Effects of Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block and Dorsal Penile Block on Postoperative Pain in Circumcision Procedures#1261242
- Continuous Nerve Block Block vs Combination of Single Block Plus Intravenous Lidocaine for Postoperative Pain.#1197659
Record · ID 1321704
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive