ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Different Objective Nociceptive Measurement Methods During Surgery
Traditionally, hemodynamic response e.g. pulse and blood pressure are used to evaluate pain in humans who are anesthetized. These values, however, can be affected by factors other than pain response . In this observational study, different types of digital methods are used that can distinguish signs of pain. However, the study aim to collect data and correlate in between different methods to ensure its reliability.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Cerebral and Autonomic Responses to Pain in Healthy Humans#884999
- Efficacy of Multimodal Analgesia Following Hip Arthroscopy#864126
- Assessment of the Nociception During Lumbar Surgery#855229
- Prediction of Hemodynamic Reactivity During General Anesthesia Using Analgesia/Nociception Index (ANI)#897492
- Influence of Variations of Systemic Venous Return on Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) During General Anaesthesia#902973
Record · ID 1321921
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive