ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Single-use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope vs Nondisposable Fiber Optic vs Digital Ureteroscope
The aim of this trial is to compare the safety, efficacy and cost effectiveness of the three types of scopes.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Digital health engagement among urological patients in four European countries: findings from an international cross-sectional survey by the European Association of Urology Section of Outpatient and Office Urology.#323267
- Trial to Visualize the Ureters With Nizaracianine Triflutate in Adults Undergoing Abdominopelvic Surgery#1163659
- The Utility of Urinalysis Prior to In-Office Procedures#811072
- e-Sense® Normal Values of Urodynamic Pressures Using e-Sense® Catheters#1149875
- First-in-man Safety and Efficacy Trial of a Novel Non-invasive Bladder Emptying Device: The NIBED Study#849347
Record · ID 1322549
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive