ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Open Lung Approach Versus Standard Protective Strategies
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of adding a recruitment maneuver (RM) to low tidal volume (VT) ventilation, with or without an individualized post-RM positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) setting in lung-healthy patients during anesthesia.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Very Low Tidal Volume vs Conventional Ventilatory Strategy for One-lung Ventilation in Thoracic Anesthesia#1293132
- Intraoperative Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Patients Requiring Emergency Abdominal Surgery#1127786
- Airway Pressure Release Ventilation for Moderate-to-severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome#1196201
- Effect of Perioperative Lung Protective Strategies on the Occurrence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Surgery in the Prone Position#1213199
- Effect of Recruitment Maneuvers Plus Optimal PEEP Versus Optimal PEEP Alone in One Lung Ventilation#1294395
Record · ID 1322634
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive