ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Evaluation of the Analgesic Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl as Adjuvants to Epidural Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgeries
To determine if the epidural route provide an acceptable analgesia in spine surgeries and avoided the need for excessive IV analgesics. Also to determine whatever dexmedetomidine or fentanyl is more better neuroaxial adjuvant regarding providing early onset and prolonged analgesia and stable cardiorespiratory parameters
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Fentanyl as Adjuvants to Epidural Bupivacaine Plus Dexamethasone for Analgesia#1308472
- Fentanyl Versus Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia ; Peritoneal Symptomatic Effects#866085
- Effect of Intrathecal Fentanyl on Spinal Anesthesia During Dexmedetomidine Infusion#256940
- Analgesic Efficacy of Two Doses of Dexmedetomidine as Adjuncts to Lidocaine for Intravenous Regional Anesthesia#1113189
- Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl As Adjuvants to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for the Prevention of Post-spinal Shivering in Hip Arthroplasty Surgeries#832350
Record · ID 1323344
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive