ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Anti Xa Levels Under Two Different Regimens of Enoxaparin VTE Prophylaxis After Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity
Approximately two thirds of the adult population in developed countries is categorized as over-weight or obese (BMI\>30). In spite of worldwide increasing awareness, obesity is a major health concern. In the presence of numerous diets, medical therapies, and robust research, bariatric surgery remains the most effective means of weight reduction in morbidly obese patients (BMI\>40, or BMI\>35 with co-morbidities). However, bariatric surgery harbors a relatively high risk for postoperative complications; of them, venous thromboembolic events (VTE) are not common, but potentially lethal. Taken together with the propensity of morbidly obese patients to develop VTE, perioperative thromboprophylaxis is mandatory. To date, low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) are most commonly used for VTE prophylaxis in the aforementioned population. Due to the pharmacologic properties of LMWH and the characteristics of surgically treated obese patients, the optimal dose that is to be utilized for VTE prophylaxis in this population remains unclear. Assessment of anti-FXa levels in the patients' plasma can be used in order to monitor LMWH activity. Levels of 0.2-0.5 U/ml have been proposed by some authors for VTE prophylaxis. Few studies have compared different dosing regimens of enoxaparin (between 30mg-60mg q/12h) for VTE prophylaxis in the population undergoing bariatric surgery; nevertheless, these were small non- randomized trials, containing numerous methodological weaknesses. Hence, the optimal regimen of enoxaparin to be used for the prevention of VTE in the discussed population remains unclear. The aim of the present study is to evaluate plasma levels of anti-FXa activity, comparing two most commonly used enoxaparin prophylactic regimens (40mg vs 60mg q/24h) in a large and homogenous cohort of sleeve gastrectomy patients. Although universally used by bariatric surgeons, the pharmacologic efficacy of these regimens has not been evaluated in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Venous thromboembolic and bleeding risk in population with obesity hospitalized for an acute medical illness receiving enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis#376373
- Rivaroxaban vs Enoxaparin After Cesarean Section: Laboratory Thromboprophylaxis Outcomes#834495
- Low-molecular-weight Heparin (LMWH) Versus Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) in Pregnant Women With Recurrent Abortion Secondary to Antiphospholipid Syndrome#915142
- Offset of Ticagrelor's Effect on Endothelial Function as Assessed With Peripheral Arterial Tonometry (EndoPAT Assay)#1228546
- Effect of Aerobic Exercises on Sex Hormones and Coagulation Factors in Postmenopausal Elderly Women#902505
Record · ID 1323484
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive