ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Clinical Outcomes of Bioactive Glass S53P4 in Radical Mastoid Cavity Obliteration
Radical cavities resulting from open tympanoplasty performed for chronic cholesteatomatous otitis may lead to postoperative complications and negatively affect patients' quality of life. These cavities can remain unstable and may be associated with persistent otorrhea, limitations in the use of hearing aids, and the need to avoid water exposure, all of which may significantly impact daily activities. Although mastoid and paratympanic cavity obliteration techniques are increasingly used during primary surgery, many patients previously treated with open tympanoplasty continue to present with problematic postoperative cavities. Obliteration procedures have been proposed in revision surgery to improve cavity stability and reduce complications. Bioactive glass S53P4 has recently attracted interest as an obliterative material due to its long-term stability, biocompatibility, antibacterial properties, and ability to integrate with surrounding tissues. However, evidence regarding the medium-term clinical outcomes of this approach remains limited. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of mastoid cavity obliteration using bioactive glass S53P4 in patients with radical cavities following open tympanoplasty. The study will assess surgical success, complication rates, and the impact of the procedure on patient quality of life.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Secondary Obliteration of Old Radical Cavities Using S53P4 Bioactive Glass#1033640
- The Effect Of Preoperative Anxiety Level On Postoperative SoreThroat#861631
- Autobone and Bioactive Glass With Ridge Splitting#1281544
- Allograft bone vs. bioactive glass in rehabilitation of canal wall-down surgery#121884
- Efficacy of Bioactive Glass vs. Xenograft in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation#868237
Record · ID 1323631
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive