ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Validity and Reliability of the PROprioception Measurement Tool (PROMT)
This project assesses the feasibility, reliability, and validity of the PROMT in children with a UMN lesion. The study questions are: is the newly developed PROMT a feasible, reliable, and valid tool to assess lower limb proprioception in children with UMN lesions? Does the PROMT differ between children with UMN lesion and controlled neurotypically developing peers? Further, does the proprioception modalities assessed with the PROMT correlate with motor function in this group of children?
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Adapted Frenkle Exercises Versus Dynamic Balance Training in School Going Children#842012
- Validity and Reliability The Foot-taping Test in Children With Cerebral Palsy#864183
- PlayGait: A Dynamic Exoskeleton#1198125
- Effects of Robotic Hand Therapy on Hand Function and Dexterity in Cerebral Palsy#847735
- The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of TASC and the Relationship Between SMC and Motor Functions#1140963
Record · ID 1323643
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive