arXiv (All)
open access
An Empirical Case Study of Prompt Engineering Strategies for Bypassing Multi-Layer Agent Security Defenses
The OpenClaw Security Attack and Defense Challenge evaluates AI agent robustness through a three-stage defense pipeline: skill file scanning (Stage 1), instruction safety evaluation (Stage 2), and attack trajectory scoring (Stage 3). This paper presents an empirical case study of prompt engineering
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Applying Security by Design at the Point of Execution: How Governed Security Requirements Affect the Security of AI-Generated Code#1247586
- Applying Security by Design at the Point of Execution: How Governed Security Requirements Affect the Security of AI-Generated Code#1242722
- From Requirements to Attack Trees: Grounded LLM Agents for Design-Time Security Review#1199094
- BAITBENCH: Measuring Agent Reward Hacking with Optional Shortcuts Planted in ML Tasks#818778
- BAITBENCH: Measuring Agent Reward Hacking with Optional Shortcuts Planted in ML Tasks#808786
Record · ID 1324717
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive