arXiv (All)
open access
e1: Learning Adaptive Control of Reasoning Effort
Increasing the thinking budget of AI models can significantly improve accuracy, but not all questions warrant the same amount of reasoning. Users may prefer to allocate different amounts of reasoning effort depending on how they value output quality versus latency and cost. To leverage this tradeoff
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Confident, Not Wiser: The Dunning-Kruger Effect in Human-AI Interaction#1105653
- Humans Disengage, Reasoning Models Persist: Separating Difficulty Registration from Deliberation Allocation#1083122
- Response Variability and Stability in Human Reasoning#1187686
- Calibration, Not Answer Selection: Distilling Internal Confidence in Reasoning Models#1118002
- Questioning the Questions: Sustaining Self-Evolution in Reasoning Models#1199573
Record · ID 1325049
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive