arXiv (All)
open access
Re-executing Coding-Agent Evaluations: Unchanged Decisions and Unresolved Policy Risk
Executable tests grade large language model (LLM) coding-agent patches for leaderboards, rewards and self-improvement. Two preregistered re-execution studies returned negative results. SWE-bench Pro v1's offline option rejected none of 59 accepted Go patches whose grading configuration changed. Thei
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Groupwise Agentic Grading and Advantage Redistribution for Code Agent RL#1116908
- Frozen Judges, Moving Agents: Version-Dependent LLM-Judge Error and the Limits of Judge-Assisted Agent Evaluation#1119271
- Can Foundation Models Moderate Online Content? Evaluating Instruction- vs. Example-Driven Policy Operationalization#1069944
- Does Code Cleanliness Affect Coding Agents? A Controlled Minimal-Pair Study#204827
- Symbolic Guidance for LLM Agents in Distributed Multiagent Coordination#1115919
Record · ID 1325356
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive