arXiv (All)
open access
Are Multimodal Benchmarks Really Useful? Item-Level Multimodal Benchmark Diagnosis via Structure-Response Co-Calibration
Multimodal benchmarks are central to evaluating whether models can reason over information from multiple modalities. However, existing literature has revealed that some benchmarks may contain shortcut items that can be answered from a single modality or from answer-option regularities alone, thus fa
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- MatToolBench: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents in Real-World Materials Science Workflows#1132254
- Semantic Head Specialization Guides Hybrid ViT Attention for Multimodal LLMs#792394
- Semantic Head Specialization Guides Hybrid ViT Attention for Multimodal LLMs#788394
- FLIP: Final Layer Inference-Time Probing for Vision-Language Models#1105552
- TRIPROBE: Probing Task Separability Beyond Classification for XAI#1012706
Record · ID 1325438
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive