arXiv (All)
open access
Impact of Expertise and Trust on AI-assisted Work
Artificial intelligence (AI) agents promise to extend what users can accomplish beyond their existing expertise, but they also raise the risk of producing plausible-looking work that users may struggle to evaluate. We ask how task-relevant expertise and trust in AI shape agent-assisted work. To isol
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Inferring Gifted Potential from AI-Assisted Work: An Attributional Validity Framework for Gifted Education#1001839
- MODELING TRUST IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR NAVAL COMMAND AND CONTROL#663856
- On assessing the possibility of implementing artificial intelligence technologies in the system of the Treasury Service Committee — Institutional Capacity Building Project (Uzbekistan)#606600
- On assessing the possibility of implementing artificial intelligence technologies in the system of the Treasury Service Committee — Institutional Capacity Building Project (Uzbekistan)#606576
- Studying the Best Can Mislead: Selection Bias in Expertise Research#29804
Record · ID 1325556
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive