arXiv (All)
open access
Understanding Hidden Spatial Preferences in Bayesian Optimization
Bayesian optimization uses posterior uncertainty to decide where to explore, but this uncertainty is not spatially neutral. On bounded domains, Gaussian-process posterior variance is typically larger near faces, edges, and corners, giving variance-based acquisition functions a systematic boundary bi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond Expected Information Gain: Stable Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design with Integral Probability Metrics and Plug-and-Play Extensions#126504
- Simulated annealing and Weak Poincaré inequalities with inverse-polynomial accuracy for the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model#1234249
- TAP Accuracy Below the Fluctuation Scale and Universal Posterior Geometry in Spherical Linear Models#1034390
- TAP Accuracy Below the Fluctuation Scale and Universal Posterior Geometry in Spherical Linear Models#978429
- Spatial Proximity Determines Overshadowing Between Landmarks in Human Spatial Navigation#456148
Record · ID 1325592
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive