arXiv (All)
open access
How to Build a Benchmark That Actually Measures Taste
Expert-aligned "taste" benchmarks should reward craft judgment, not the ability to game the test. We introduce TasteBench, a pairwise good-vs-bad benchmark across visual, brand, book, and tech items under a frozen rubric with expert-only gold (panel n>=3; percent agreement >=0.60 primary gate; weak
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- RECOB: Reliable Benchmarking of Experimental Optimization in Chemistry and Materials Science#1034865
- Benchmarking System One decision models against trained classifiers and language models for automated decision gates#1154969
- Confident Rankings with Fewer Items: Adaptive LLM Evaluation with Continuous Scores#1084119
- When LLMs Benchmark Themselves: Deconstructing Self-Bias in Automated Evaluation#798650
- When LLMs Benchmark Themselves: Deconstructing Self-Bias in Automated Evaluation#797236
Record · ID 1325603
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive