arXiv (All)
open access
Lumen-bench: Cross-Lingual Safety Gaps and the Say-Do Problem in Tool-Calling Large Language Models
When a large language model refuses an unethical request, what does refusal mean? In conversation, refusal is bounded by what the model says; once the model is equipped with executable tools, what it does can diverge from what it says, a failure mode that English-only evaluations cannot fully reveal
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generation#1317990
- A METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK ON THE USE OF LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS (LLMS) AND PROMPTENGINEERING IN SCREENWRITING PROCESSES”#381630
- Naming as Intervention: The "Hallucination" Taxonomy as Epistemic Misdirection in Generative Transformer Research#203988
- Mimicry Cost Architecture: Why Strategic Deception Becomes Structurally Expensive Over Time#216099
- Why a Declared Deployment Class Does Not Wait for the Open Interior—an Interface Theorem of Conservativity, Restriction, Declaration, and Boundary#691637
Record · ID 1326030
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive