arXiv (All)
open access
Trust Hinders Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment
Trust calibration remains the dominant framing of AI-assisted decision making: the goal is to close the gap between perceived and actual trustworthiness of AI systems so that users exhibit appropriate reliance on them. We argue that this approach, while useful for decision problems that are well-def
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Calibrating appropriate trust in human–AI decision-making: The role of system explanations and domain expertise#342826
- A Formal Account of AI Trustworthiness: Connecting Intrinsic and Perceived Trustworthiness#72231
- Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective#1178506
- Should You Trust Your Voice Assistant? It’s Complicated, but No#80658
- Algorithmic Decision-Making, Agency Costs, and Institution-Based Trust#106613
Record · ID 1326032
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive