arXiv (All)
open access
Claims, Designs, and Guarantees: A Critical Narrative Review of Statistical Inference Reform and Practice, 2016--2026
Statistics helps scientists decide what their data show, but its most familiar tool, the $p$-value, is widely misunderstood. Between 2016 and 2026, professional bodies issued new guidance, and researchers developed or popularised alternatives and complements: compatibility intervals, equivalence tes
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Teaching Vampire New Tricks: An Experimental Study of Neural Clause Selection#1110602
- Recent Cochrane review has serious flaws: A perspective of clinicians and researchers from around the world.#409122
- It’s Not So Obvious: How the Manifestly Evident Standard Affects Litigation Costs by Reducing the Need for Claim Construction#1021684
- The ‘extendedness’ of scientific evidence#744520
- Causal Inference in Clinical Research: A Primer.#453974
Record · ID 1326234
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive