arXiv (All)
open access
CoBG: Learning from Player Reviews to Design, Critique, and Revise Board Game Rulebooks
Board game design alternates between thinking as a designer and experiencing as a player, over repeated cycles of prototyping, critique, and revision. This loop is cognitively demanding: without knowing how players will receive a rule, a designer cannot tell what to revise. We present CoBG, a design
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Information Design in Smooth Games#158595
- The Philosophical Game of Chess: A Framework for Collaborative Intellectual Inquiry and Shared Philosophical Investment#701223
- The Cognitive Control Account of Effort#95167
- Understanding Games as Played:Sketch for a first-person perspective for computer game analysis#747909
- Educational Efficacy Assessment of a Serious Game to Teach Insulin Therapy to Primary Care Physicians#1101893
Record · ID 1326301
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive