arXiv (All)
open access
CauSec: Unboxing the Causal Drivers of Static Vulnerability Analysis Performance
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) tools are widely used in both industry and academia. Such tools often make design choices that sacrifice detection to achieve higher performance, i.e., increased precision, decreased runtime, or increased scalability. These design choices rely on certain as
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- CauSec: Unboxing the Causal Drivers of Static Vulnerability Analysis Performance#467075
- Generating Proof-of-Vulnerability Tests to Help Enhance the Security of Complex Software#155358
- Beyond Static Guarantees: Measuring the Static-Pass Dynamic-Fail Gap in Security-Sensitive and LLM-Generated Python Code#997752
- Beyond Static Guarantees: Measuring the Static-Pass Dynamic-Fail Gap in Security-Sensitive and LLM-Generated Python Code#673433
- SNIPTEST: Fuzzing Multi-Level Code Slices for Validating Vulnerabilities#463293
Record · ID 1326387
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive