arXiv (All)
open access
A Cosine-Projection Framework for Choosing Among Cox HR, D-RMST, and Average-Hazard Tests in Survival Trials
The log-rank/Cox hazard-ratio test remains the standard approach for the primary analysis of randomized trials with time-to-event endpoints and is fully efficient under proportional hazards (PH). Two model-free alternatives that have recently gained attention are the difference in restricted mean su
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Simple Test for the Absence of Covariate Dependence in Hazard Regression Models#1275735
- Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) Has Revolutionised Management of Complicated PPE, Our Study to Determine VATS Decortication Technique is Needed, Compared to VATS Debridement in PPE, Also RAPID Score and Pleural US Parameters Can Predict Which VATS Procedure is Needed.#387283
- State-space representation of early-life child mortality dynamics: linking event history analysis and orbit-based models#1217612
- Validity of SOFA Score as Predictor of Mortality in Critically-ill Burn Patients#1161308
- Bicentric Study on the Use of ECMO-VV or VA for Severe ARDS Associated With Covid-19#1046499
Record · ID 1326399
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive