arXiv (All)
open access
Accuracy and Uncertainty in Machine Deception Detection (Research White Paper)
A deception detector is only as useful as the trust its alarms deserve. Like a polygraph, detectors that read a language model's internal activations can catch deceptive responses that look honest. Yet current detectors depend on which layers they read, weaken on broader tests, and do not state how
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A comparative study of DistilBERT and Perceiver for deceptive review detection in hospitality review data.#1080582
- Robustness of Multiple Indicators in Automated Screening Systems for Deception Detection#369767
- No evidence for the utility of negative cues in a visual search-based concealed information test.#262897
- Optimally tracking the truth: The ecological rationality of confirmation measures#724026
- Truth Lies Deep: Countering Semantic Camouflage via Latent Intent Verification#658955
Record · ID 1326564
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive