arXiv (All)
open access
When do explicit penalties improve flow matching?
Flow matching can learn structure directly from data, raising the question of when additional constraints improve generation. We study penalties that encode such constraints, with physics-informed flow matching as a motivating example. Satisfying a constraint more closely need not make the generated
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- MeshCarve: Artisan Mesh Generation with Flow Matching in Compact Latent Spaces#1234090
- MintFlow: Minimal Trajectory Intervention for Constrained Flow Matching#1186574
- SpecLens: LLM-Based Verilog Generation with Specification-Derived Constraints via Behavioral Divergence#1122737
- Climate Physics Dynamic Matching#780764
- Climate Physics Dynamic Matching#779389
Record · ID 1326939
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive