arXiv (All)
open access
Resource Allocation with Midterm Review
A principal funds an agent's project over two periods, with a midterm review providing a public signal about project quality. The agent privately knows the project's quality and always prefers more funding, while the principal wants to match funding to quality. A natural benchmark uses the review on
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Position: Evaluation Scores Are Perishable Knowledge Claims#411119
- Risk Is Not Review Value: Wrong-Answer Exposure Under Bounded Review Budgets#975158
- 42 U.S.C. § 1862o-9 — Broader impacts merit review criterion#593540
- Mem++: Non-Destructive Memory for Long-Term Organizational LLM Agents#1161083
- Mem++: Non-Destructive Memory for Long-Term Organizational LLM Agents#1157350
Record · ID 1327036
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive