arXiv (All)
open access
Review Rarely Beats the Stronger Model: Separating Verification from Capability Transfer in LLM Pipelines
Qwen3-8B reviewing Llama-3.1-8B in math adds 33.2 points, yet Qwen3-8B alone is 6.4 points more accurate than the result. Reviewing another model's answer is usually judged by its gain over the generator. We show that this confuses verification, which adds accuracy beyond either model alone, with ca
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluation Bias and Epistemic Inequality in Global Software Development#366331
- Quantifying and Auditing LLM Evaluation via Positive--Unlabeled Learning#287155
- Constraint Decay: The Fragility of LLM Agents in Backend Code Generation#168374
- Bias in the Loop: Auditing LLM-as-a-Judge for Software Engineering#120615
- Toward trustworthy artificial intelligence in multi-omics: a review of reproducibility, stability, and interpretability.#174518
Record · ID 1327147
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive