arXiv (All)
open access
How the Classical Baseline Shapes Machine-Learning Speed Claims in Topology Optimization
Topology optimization places material so that a structure resists deformation under given loads. Machine-learning methods often report large speed-ups over classical, non-learned optimization, but a slow classical code or a less stiff learned design can exaggerate them. We re-ran released code for e
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- KATOsuper: Surrogate-accelerated neural topology optimization with sensitivity-consistent Fourier neural operators#1063427
- Deep learning driven framework for optimization of polycrystalline microstructures under competing strength requirements#1233500
- Neural topology optimization of ship structures under propulsion machinery vibrations#1142385
- Neural topology optimization of ship structures under propulsion machinery vibrations#1122292
- TopoMamba: A Load-Support Relation-Guided Multi-Directional State-Space Model for Topology Optimization#1118761
Record · ID 1327641
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive