arXiv (All)
open access
Efficient Multi-Agent Reasoning via Confidence-Guided Adaptive Debate
Multi-agent debate has shown promise for improving the reasoning of large language models, yet recent theory suggests its benefits are highly regime-dependent. While interaction can amplify informative signals under corrective conditions, symmetric debate dynamics are neutral in expectation, often m
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- When Debate Helps: Proposal Supply and Verification-Aware Readout in Multi-Agent Reasoning#1200337
- Consensus and Factual Dynamics in Large Populations of Interacting Language Models#1144178
- Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate#16585
- When Order Matters: First-Speaker Bias and Mitigation through Personality in Sequential Multi-Agent Debate#1143931
- SEPAL: Separated Expert Pairs with Answer-Level Fusion for Reliable LLM Collaboration#1144612
Record · ID 1327933
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive