arXiv (All)
open access
Rule vs.Consequence: Dissociable Internal Representations of Moral Reasoning in LLMs
Large language models are increasingly deployed in morally and legally sensitive contexts, yet little is known about how they internally represent distinctions between moral reasoning styles. We ask whether a model's differential response to rule-framed and consequence-framed moral questions reflect
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Echoes of Deeds: Moral History Can Shape and Steer LLM Behavioral Choices#1129672
- Models of Moral Cognition#777021
- How Language Models Organize and Structure Moral Knowledge#1234792
- Complex-Preference Beings: LLMs, Second-Order Volitions, and Moral Agency#693078
- How do LLMs reflect human moral foundations? a study using the moral foundations framework#693621
Record · ID 1327961
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive