arXiv (All)
open access
AuthGateBench: Benchmarking LLMs as Authorization Gate
Automated approval systems let coding agents execute high-risk actions with minimal human oversight by delegating the authorization decision to a classifier, typically a large language model (LLM). Such systems, adopted in tools like Claude Code and Codex, remain vulnerable to failure modes such as
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Quantifying Overclaiming Propensity in Frontier LLM Agents#978407
- ToolFence: Fine-Grained Authorization for Secure Tool-Using LLM Agents#1132397
- ToolFence: Fine-Grained Authorization for Secure Tool-Using LLM Agents#1122203
- BankerToolBench: Evaluating AI Agents in End-to-End Investment Banking Workflows#1356019
- AgenTRIM: Tool Risk Mitigation for Agentic AI#793551
Record · ID 1328016
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive