PsyArXiv
metadata only
Dissociating Accuracy and Metacognition in Nutritional Judgements
The gap between nutritional knowledge and dietary behaviour remains poorly understood, yet may partly reflect systematic biases in how individuals evaluate food and assess their own nutritional judgements. Here, we introduce the MetaBites task, a novel two-alternative forced-choice paradigm assessin
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Dissociating Accuracy and Metacognition in Nutritional Judgements#1330701
- Dissociating Accuracy and Metacognition in Nutritional Judgements#1330609
- Performance and choice measures in an experimental context reveal strong preferences for self-benefitting compared to pro-environmental outcomes#345579
- What does the so-called False Belief Task actually check?#700638
- The effect of time pressure on metacognitive control: developmental changes in self‑regulation and efficiency during learning#736778
Record · ID 1330735
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive