arXiv CS
open access
Limits of Statistical Assurance for Embodied and Agentic AI under Adaptive Adversaries
Finite safety assessments cannot exclude an adversary that preserves unattacked behavior until certification and activates afterward. We characterize this limitation for embodied and tool-use AI. An adversary that matches the complete observation law until observable, irrevocable certification and r
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Limits of Statistical Assurance for Embodied and Agentic AI under Adaptive Adversaries#1344771
- How to Speculate about Uncertainty in Agentic Coding? A Draft-Model Gate Method#972210
- VST: Verifiable Structured Transport for Auditable Agent-to-Agent Alpha Discovery#975129
- Alignment Cannot Detect Awareness#717775
- AgentLSD: Evaluating AI Security Agents Under Adversarial Task Contamination#1013342
Record · ID 1335945
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive