ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Hemostatic Agent to Suture in Terms of Hemostatic Function and Preservation of Ovarian Function
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of preservation of ovarian function, hemostasis, and safety of a hemostatic agent versus suturing during laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy for ovarian endometriosis.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Impact on Ovarian Reserve of Diode Laser vs Bipolar Coagulation of Endometriomas#910593
- Assessment of Ovarian Reserve in the Treatment of Ovarian Endometrioma With Cystectomy or Argon Plasma Coagulation: A Aandomized Clinical Trial#1323634
- PReservation Study of Ovarian Function And Hemostasis, and Its Safety of Surgiguard@ During Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy#991967
- Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Vi-sealer#1195829
- The Affect of Hemostasis Technique During Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy on Future Fertility#1032901
Record · ID 1337833
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive