ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Chlorhexidine Gluconate Versus Povidone-iodine
A hysterectomy, or removal of the uterus, is a common surgery performed for a variety of reasons. During this surgery, to prevent infection, the vagina is thoroughly prepped with a cleansing solution, most commonly chlorhexidine gluconate or povidone-iodine. While studies have shown that chlorhexidine gluconate is better at killing bacteria people have raised concerns on how it affects the vaginal tissue. It is important to study these effects the cleansing solution surgeons use for this surgery can not only prevent infection but not cause harmful side effects.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Povidone-iodine and the Normal Saline Cleaning the Incision for the SSIs#1010708
- Clinical Evaluation of Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery Utilizing Intraoperative Incisional Wound Irrigation#895545
- POPQ Associated With Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy#830997
- Effect of a Combination of Bundles on Surgical-site Infection After Elective Colorectal Surgery#868208
- The Incidence of Pelvic Hematoma Following Hysterectomy#897131
Record · ID 1337982
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive