ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
ESPB vs.Combination of ESPB and Superficial PIPB in Cardiac Surgery
Cardiac surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain. Pain control is an essential part of enhanced recovery protocols. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacies of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and the combination of ESPB and superficial parasternal intercostal plane block (PIPB) in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Erector Spinae Block and Combined Deep and Superficial Serratus Anterior Plane Block#1171287
- Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Oblique-Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Emergency Abdominal Surgery with Midline Incision#835466
- Postoperative Analgesia in Breast Cancer Surgery: Safety and Efficiency of Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block#912232
- Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Modified Pectoral Fascial Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery#842889
- Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of US Guided ESP Block With Port Site Infiltration Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy#1127723
Record · ID 1338745
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive