arXiv (All)
open access
How much does the map of science depend on the embedding model?
Science maps describe relationships between papers. Text embedding models build these relationships by turning a paper's text into a list of numbers that gives it a position. Would another model give the same picture? I compare ten models using titles and abstracts of 500,000 publications from the O
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Exploring Marshall–Olkin Models Through Bibliometric and Topic Modeling Approaches Uses Latent Dirichlet Allocation (1981-2025): A Study Based on Scopus Data#169466
- ChEmbed: Enhancing Chemical Literature Search Through Domain-Specific Text Embeddings#1118406
- Dataset Top 10 Journals in Library Information Science: The Relationship Between Altmetric Attention Score and Immediacy of Citation in Scopus and Google Scholar#1052891
- HeTGB: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Heterophilic Text-Attributed Graphs#793418
- HeTGB: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Heterophilic Text-Attributed Graphs#789414
Record · ID 1341528
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive