arXiv (All)
open access
Fact-check? True!: Tracking Verification Requests and the Absence of Truth Verdicts across Correction Systems
Misperceptions can run in two directions. Individuals can either believe false information or reject true information, with experimental work finding that debunking efforts are effective at correcting both forms of misperception. Yet despite the efficacy of true corrections, current debunking system
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Truthmakers, paradox and plausibility#117352
- The Hallucination Regime: When Coherence Replaces Reality#96642
- CAAFC: Chronological Actionable Automated Fact-Checker for misinformation / non-factual hallucination detection and correction#178910
- The heterogeneity problem for sensitivity accounts#752838
- A Systems Approach to Countermeasures in Credibility Assessment Interviews#369745
Record · ID 1341949
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive