arXiv (All)
open access
Calibrating LLM Explanations to Human Decisions with Reinforcement Learning
Explanations of LLM outputs are considered an important way to make model behavior legible, helping human users make good decisions on downstream tasks. However, default training approaches for improving explanations target model task performance or human preference rather than human decision qualit
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Systematic Review of Human-Centered Explainability in Reinforcement Learning: Transferring the RCC Framework to Support Epistemic Trustworthiness#707577
- Evolving Support Priorities in Empathetic Reinforcement Learning#1119322
- Evaluating the Quality of Machine Learning Explanations: A Survey on Methods and Metrics#335872
- Learning Process Rewards via Reasoning State Propagation#1144187
- Decision-Tree Surrogates for Weak Counterfactual Explanations in Integer Optimization#1202306
Record · ID 1342182
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive