arXiv (All)
open access
Do Theorem Provers Need Theorem-Proving Agents? mini-Lean-agent: A Coding-Agent Baseline for Lean
General-purpose coding agents use standard shell and file interactions, yet formal theorem-proving agents often rely on specialized, ad-hoc tooling. This makes it difficult to determine which components of theorem-proving agents provide benchmark gains: an improved base model, a specialized harness,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ProofLoom: Proof-Obligation-Driven Theory Construction for Autoformalizing Research-Level Stochastic Optimization#1129567
- Viva La Vida: Verification and Accumulation Failures in Multi-Agent Proof Search#1200480
- AgentStripes: An Evidence-Graded Maturity Model for AI Agents#1344103
- Understanding Bugs in Modern Agentic Frameworks: A Study of Symptoms, Root Causes, and Triggering Conditions#1199790
- Proof2Hybrid: Automatic Mathematical Benchmark Synthesis for Proof-Centric Problems#792648
Record · ID 1342207
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive