arXiv (All)
open access
claimcheck: Measuring and Improving Specification Faithfulness
Formal verification proves that a program satisfies its specification, but says nothing about whether the specification captures what the author meant. As LLMs increasingly write both code and specifications, a gap between the author's natural-language requirement and the specification becomes a liv
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Schwarz: Solver-Aware Agentic Program Verification#818849
- Schwarz: Solver-Aware Agentic Program Verification#808857
- SpecSyn: LLM-based Synthesis and Refinement of Formal Specifications for Real-world Program Verification#1326251
- Diversifying to Verify: When Task-Equivalent Programs Differ in Verifiability#361509
- SaltBench: A Referee-Gated Protocol for Measuring Method Effects in Machine-Checked Software Work#998636
Record · ID 1342234
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive