arXiv (All)
open access
False Positives and Other Statistical Errors in Standard Analyses of Eye Movements in Reading
In research on eye movements in reading, it is common to analyze a number of canonical dependent measures to study how the effects of a manipulation unfold over time. Although this gives rise to the well-known multiple comparisons problem, i.e. an inflated probability that the null hypothesis is inc
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Retrieval-related Eye Movements Are Predictive of Memory Precision.#785507
- The effect of frequency of exposure on the processing and learning of collocations: A comparison of first and second language readers' eye movements#344083
- Statistical learning and reading: sensitivity to letter co-occurrence statistics in eye movements across languages#416333
- Motor fluency and preference judgments: typing speed as a predictor of letter dyads’ likeability#644365
- Looked but didn't see: inattentional blindness and yes-bias confabulation in vision-language models#377123
Record · ID 1342253
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive